Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 25.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 4.24 x 1.84 x 0.79 inches | 3.42 x 1.77 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 2.83 ounces |
| $ 325.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| -- | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 310 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2660 is just a bit better than the Nokia 2600, having a general score of 25.7 against 23.6. Nokia 2660's body is lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Nokia 2600. The Nokia 2660 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 2600, because it has a bit higher resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
The Nokia 2600 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 2660, because it has 2,05 MB more internal storage. The Nokia 2660's CPU is just as good as the Nokia 2600 one, both of them have a 0-Core processor. Nokia 2660 features a camera that's just as good as the camera in Nokia 2600.
The Nokia 2600 has greater battery life than Nokia 2660, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 700mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia 2660 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.