Compare phones
Samsung M400
SPH-M400| Global Score | |
| 31.5 | 39.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | 2012-10-15 |
| 3.22 x 1.65 x 0.62 inches | 3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches |
| 2.32 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| $ 65.00 | $ 65.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| 114 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset |
| processor | Single-Core 480 MHz processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.57 |
| Storage | |
| 25,6 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | -- |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Samsung M400 has a global score of 39.5, which is way better than the Nokia 2605 Mirage's general score of 31.5. The Samsung M400 is a thicker and heavier device than Nokia 2605 Mirage. Samsung M400 has a little sharper screen than Nokia 2605 Mirage, because it has a better screen pixels density, a way better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a really bigger screen.
Samsung M400 counts with a quite better performance than Nokia 2605 Mirage, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster). Nokia 2605 Mirage counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung M400. Samsung M400 has a way better camera than Nokia 2605 Mirage, because it has a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Nokia 2605 Mirage has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung M400, because it has 1050mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung M400 costs the same than Nokia 2605 Mirage.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.