Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.5 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2006-03-30 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.09 x 1.69 x 0.70 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 199.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| 86 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 970mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 380 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W230 has an overall score of 28.8, which is slightly better than the Nokia 2610's global score of 26.5. Motorola W230 is a thinner and lighter phone than Nokia 2610. Nokia 2610 and Motorola W230 feature very similar processing units, both have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola W230 has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 2610, and although they both have an equal resolution of 128 x 128 pixels, the Motorola W230 also has a greater display density.
Motorola W230 and Nokia 2610 feature extremely similar cameras. The Nokia 2610 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola W230, although it has no external memory slot. Nokia 2610 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola W230, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola W230 is also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.