Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2008-04-02 | 2009-02-16 |
| 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 79.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 102 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 128 x 96 video resolution | -- |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 419 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung E2210 is a little bit better than Nokia 2680 slide, with a global score of 34.1 against 31.2. Samsung E2210 is a newer and just a bit lighter device than the Nokia 2680 slide, although it is also thicker. The Samsung E2210 has a slightly better screen than Nokia 2680 slide, and although they both have the same resolution of 160 x 128, the Samsung E2210 also has a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Nokia 2680 slide counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung E2210, because it has 23,55 MB more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 2680 slide and the Samsung E2210 count with quite similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 2680 slide has a bit better battery performance than Samsung E2210, because it has an 860mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung E2210 has a camera that's very similar to the Nokia 2680 slide one, they have a camera with a 0.3 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung E2210 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.