Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3437.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2009-01-292009-02-16
4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches3.93 x 1.89 x 0.56 inches
3.00 ounces3.35 ounces
$ 399.00$ 135.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.36.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.40
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
288 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
380 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
2.642.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

The Samsung S3500 is just a bit better than the Nokia 2700 classic, having a score of 37.4 against 34. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Samsung S3500's construction is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Nokia 2700 classic. Samsung S3500 has a bit better screen than Nokia 2700 classic, because although it has a just a little lower display density, and they both have the same 320 x 240 resolution, the Samsung S3500 also counts with a quite larger screen.

The Samsung S3500 and Nokia 2700 classic both feature really similar processors, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 2700 classic counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung S3500, although it has no SD card slot. The Samsung S3500 has a camera that's very similar to the camera in Nokia 2700 classic, both have a same resolution camera.

The Nokia 2700 classic features greater battery duration than Samsung S3500, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity.

Samsung S3500 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.