Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34 | 37.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2009-01-29 | 2007-10-30 |
| 4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 3.90 x 1.90 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 3.16 ounces |
| $ 399.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | -- |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 157 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | -- |
| 4.73 | 4.51 |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Samsung SGH-A737 is a little bit better than the Nokia 2700 classic, having a 37.4 score against 34. Samsung SGH-A737 is an older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the Nokia 2700 classic. The Samsung SGH-A737 counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Nokia 2700 classic one, both have a 0-Core processor.
The Nokia 2700 classic features a little sharper display than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch. Samsung SGH-A737 and Nokia 2700 classic have quite similar memory for apps and games, because although the Samsung SGH-A737 has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 18,43 MB more internal storage capacity.
Nokia 2700 classic shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. Nokia 2700 classic features a bit better battery life than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung SGH-A737 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.