Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.13 x 2.15 x 0.74 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Grey | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm 205 Mobile Platform chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 32-bit, 28 nm (Dual-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a lot better than Nokia 2720 Flip, with a 78.8 score against 47.5. Even though Google Pixel 3a and the Nokia 2720 Flip were only released with a few months difference, Google Pixel 3a's design is a lot thinner but heavier than the Nokia 2720 Flip. Google Pixel 3a has a lot better screen than Nokia 2720 Flip, because it has a much bigger display, a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2220px.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 2720 Flip, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 60 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3a features a quite better processing power than Nokia 2720 Flip, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 3,5 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a greater camera than Nokia 2720 Flip, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution. The Google Pixel 3a features a much better battery performance than Nokia 2720 Flip, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit more expensive than Nokia 2720 Flip, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.