Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 32 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-05-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.19 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 114 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 9,22 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is way better than the Nokia 2720 fold's global score of 32. Google Pixel 3a's body is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner than Nokia 2720 fold's, although it's also extremely heavier. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much greater performance than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 8 more CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a lot better looking screen than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a way bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a much higher screen density. The Google Pixel 3a counts with much more storage for apps and games than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 64 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much longer battery duration than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 860mAh. The Google Pixel 3a shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.