Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3235.2
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2009-05-182011-03-09
3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches
3.19 ounces3.20 ounces
Black and RedGray
$ 195.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch102 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.3
processor processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
9,22 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.20
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
432 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
2.322.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Factor has an overall score of 35.2, which is better than the Nokia 2720 fold's 32 score. The Samsung Factor body has the same thickness than the Nokia 2720 fold, but it's just a little bit heavier. Nokia 2720 fold and Samsung Factor feature similar displays, because although the Samsung Factor has a quite lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 160 x 128 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.

Nokia 2720 fold features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Factor. Samsung Factor and Nokia 2720 fold both count with very similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 2720 fold features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Factor, because it has 860mAh of battery capacity against 800mAh.

Nokia 2720 fold takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Factor, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.

Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Factor is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.