Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 32 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2009-05-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.19 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 114 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 9,22 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the Nokia 2720 fold, having a global score of 83.8 against 32. Even though Galaxy A50 is much heavier than Nokia 2720 fold, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. Galaxy A50 features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a much better display density, a way bigger display and a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features a much greater hardware performance than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 8 more cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes greater pictures and videos than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 25 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a 365% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a bit more than the Nokia 2720 fold, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.