Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3437.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2009-05-182007-10-30
4.31 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches3.90 x 1.90 x 0.60 inches
3.09 ounces3.16 ounces
$ 199.00$ 150.00
Display / Screen
2 inches--
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch157 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.35.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.40.4
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.9
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
396 hours standby time
7.4 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.642.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

Samsung SGH-A737 is slightly better than the Nokia 2730 classic, having a 37.4 score against 34. Samsung SGH-A737's body is older, a bit thicker and a little heavier than the Nokia 2730 classic. The Nokia 2730 classic has a little sharper display than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px and a better number of pixels per inch of display.

Samsung SGH-A737 features a processor that is very similar to the Nokia 2730 classic one, both have 0 cpu cores. The Nokia 2730 classic has a bit better camera than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera. Samsung SGH-A737 counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the Nokia 2730 classic, because although the Samsung SGH-A737 has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 51,2 MB internal storage.

The Nokia 2730 classic features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity against 1000mAh.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung SGH-A737 is also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.