Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-10 | 2020-09-20 |
| 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Red and Titan |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 293 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 QM215 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 504 GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K22 has a general score of 66.3, which is just a bit better than Nokia 3.1 A's score of 64.8. LG K22's construction is newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Nokia 3.1 A. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG K22 has older 10 version while Nokia 3.1 A has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nokia 3.1 A has a bit better looking screen than LG K22, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 720 x 1440, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Nokia 3.1 A has a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K22, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Nokia 3.1 A has a bit faster CPU than LG K22. Both of them have 4 cores and 2 GB of RAM memory. The LG K22 has a battery performance that is just as good as Nokia 3.1 A's battery life, although the LG K22 also has a 0 percent greater battery size. LG K22 takes clearer videos and photos than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K22 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG K22 and the Nokia 3.1 A cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.