Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-10 | 2020-10-19 |
| 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 90.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 293 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 504 GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A is a bit better than the Nokia 2 V Tella, with a 64.8 score against 62.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 3.1 A has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Nokia 2 V Tella has Android 10. Despite of the fact Nokia 3.1 A is older and a little thicker than the Nokia 2 V Tella, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
Nokia 2 V Tella's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Nokia 3.1 A, they have a 2 GB RAM and a Quad-Core CPU. Nokia 2 V Tella features a display that is just as good as the display in Nokia 3.1 A, both of them have a display with the same size, the same exact 720 x 1440 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Nokia 3.1 A captures much clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 2 V Tella. Both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a camera with an 8 MP resolution and the same (Full HD) video definition. The Nokia 3.1 A has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 2 V Tella, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB, the Nokia 3.1 A also has 16 GB more internal storage.
Nokia 2 V Tella's battery life is very similar to the Nokia 3.1 A one, although the Nokia 2 V Tella also has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2990mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 A is a bit more expensive than Nokia 2 V Tella, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.