Search


Compare phones

Global Score
64.860.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
Android 9.0 PieAndroid 4.2
2019-06-102014-03-15
6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
5.50 ounces4.90 ounces
BlackBlack and White
Metal and Plastic--
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
5.5 inches4.5 inches
1440 x 720 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
IPS LCD TFT
293 pixels per inch245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
7.37.8
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset--
ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
2 GB RAM1 GB RAM
Adreno 504 GPUYes GPU
8.738.1
Storage
32 GB internal memory8 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
8.124.62
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
8.475.94
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPAHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
Nano SIMMicro SIM
6.14.6
Battery Life
2990mAh Battery2100mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
4.964
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's 60.4 score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has Android 4.2, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Nokia 3.1 A's construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's, but it's somewhat heavier.

The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch of display and a way worse resolution of 960 x 540. Nokia 3.1 A counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also has more RAM. Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior camera than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 2990mAh battery size.

The Nokia 3.1 A and the Galaxy S3 Slim cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.