Global Score | |
64.8 | 60.4 |
Basic Information | |
Nokia | Samsung |
Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.2 |
2019-06-10 | 2014-03-15 |
6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
5.50 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
Black | Black and White |
Metal and Plastic | -- |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
$ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
Display / Screen | |
5.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
1440 x 720 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
IPS LCD | TFT |
293 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.3 | 7.8 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset | -- |
ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
Adreno 504 GPU | Yes GPU |
8.73 | 8.1 |
Storage | |
32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
8.12 | 4.62 |
Camera | |
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
f/2.00 aperture | -- |
1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
8.47 | 5.94 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
6.1 | 4.6 |
Battery Life | |
2990mAh Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
4.96 | 4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
GPS | GPS |
Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
FM Radio | -- |
Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's 60.4 score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has Android 4.2, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Nokia 3.1 A's construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch of display and a way worse resolution of 960 x 540. Nokia 3.1 A counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also has more RAM. Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior camera than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 2990mAh battery size.
The Nokia 3.1 A and the Galaxy S3 Slim cost the same.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.