Compare phones
HTC Ozone
XV6175| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 42.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 |
| 2019-06-14 | 2009-06-25 |
| 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| White | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 293 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 192 MB RAM |
| Adreno 504 GPU | GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.66 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | -- |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 4.73 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 2.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 324 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 C has an overall score of 64.8, which is way better than the HTC Ozone's 42.3 score. Nokia 3.1 C counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while HTC Ozone comes with Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 OS. Even though the Nokia 3.1 C is way heavier than HTC Ozone, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Nokia 3.1 C features a lot better looking display than HTC Ozone, because it has a much bigger screen, a way better pixel count per inch of display and a much higher 720 x 1440 resolution.
Nokia 3.1 C has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC Ozone. Nokia 3.1 C has an extremely better CPU than HTC Ozone, because it has 1,81 GB more RAM and more CPU cores. The Nokia 3.1 C has a superior battery lifetime than HTC Ozone, because it has a 99% larger battery size.
Nokia 3.1 C has a lot better camera than HTC Ozone, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Nokia 3.1 C costs the same than HTC Ozone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.