Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 43.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-14 | 2012-02-27 |
| 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 3.74 ounces |
| White | Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 293 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 6.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 128 MB RAM |
| Adreno 504 GPU | GPU |
| 8.73 | 7.29 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 102,4 MB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 1.92 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 3.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 707 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C is way better than Nokia Asha 302, with a overall score of 64.8 against 43.5. Nokia 3.1 C is a extremely newer and thinner phone than the Nokia Asha 302, but it's also much heavier. The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a sharper screen than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a much better display density, a lot larger display and a much higher resolution of 720 x 1440.
Nokia 3.1 C counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 3.1 C has a greater processing power than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Nokia 3.1 C has a way better battery performance than Nokia Asha 302, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity against 1430mAh. The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a very superior camera than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a way higher 8 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much better 1920x1080 video resolution.
Nokia 3.1 C costs the same than Nokia Asha 302.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.