Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.88 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 310 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is way better than the Nokia 3.1, with an 80 score against 65.5. Google Pixel 3's design is a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Nokia 3.1, and both were released with only 4 months difference. Google Pixel 3 features a brighter screen than Nokia 3.1, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a better pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 3.1, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Nokia 3.1, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 3.1, because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much better (4K) video resolution. Nokia 3.1 features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also cheap compared to the Nokia 3.1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.