Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-07-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.76 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gray and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 310 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than the Nokia 3.1, with a overall score of 76.4 against 65.5. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a much older, somewhat heavier and thicker phone than the Nokia 3.1. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version and Nokia 3.1 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater processing power than Nokia 3.1, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better looking screen than Nokia 3.1, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo and Nokia 3.1 have really similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have equal 32 GB internal storage. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery lifetime than Nokia 3.1, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures better photographs and videos than Nokia 3.1, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.