Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than Nokia 3.4's 65.3 global score. The Google Pixel 3 construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Nokia 3.4, although it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little better performance than Nokia 3.4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much better display than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and way more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 3 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Nokia 3.4 has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Nokia 3.4 features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.