Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is way better than Nokia 3.4, with a 78.9 score against 65.3. Although the Google Pixel 3a XL is older than the Nokia 3.4, it's design is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and Nokia 3.4 has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better looking screen than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a greater pixels density. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Nokia 3.4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior camera than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Nokia 3.4 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Nokia 3.4 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs a bit more money than Nokia 3.4, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.