Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-10-26 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than the Nokia 3.4, having a overall score of 71.5 against 65.3. The Galaxy S III Cricket body has the same thickness than the Nokia 3.4, but it is lighter. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version while Nokia 3.4 has Android 10.
Nokia 3.4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a better looking display than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
The Nokia 3.4 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Nokia 3.4 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S III Cricket captures a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 3.4, although it has a lot less MP camera and a lower (Full HD) video quality.
Nokia 3.4 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.