Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-26 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the Nokia 3.4, getting a score of 83.3 against 65.3. Samsung Galaxy S9's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Nokia 3.4, although it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a lot better looking display than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little better processing power than Nokia 3.4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S9 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Nokia 3.4 counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 features a much better camera than Nokia 3.4, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.