Compare phones
Nokia 301
Dual SIM| Global Score | |
| 36.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Series 40 UI | -- |
| 2013-02-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 1.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 504 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the Nokia 301, getting a score of 82.5 against 36.8. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is much newer and a lot thinner, but also way heavier than the Nokia 301. Google Pixel 2 XL has an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 301, because it has a lot better screen pixel density, a lot larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Nokia 301, although it has no external memory slot. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with an extremely better CPU than Nokia 301, because it has 8 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 2 XL takes much clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 301, because it has a way bigger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations, a lot better video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better battery performance than Nokia 301, because it has a 193 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 2 XL costs a little more money than the Nokia 301, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.