Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.642.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2003-09-122009-06-25
4.21 x 1.77 x 0.83 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
3.17 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
Camera
0.10 MP2.00 MP
3.084.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.32.9
Battery Life
780mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
288 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.243.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The HTC Ozone is way better than the Nokia 3200, with a 42.3 score against 26.6. HTC Ozone's construction is notably newer and much thinner than Nokia 3200's, but it's also somewhat heavier. The HTC Ozone has a faster processor than Nokia 3200, because it has a larger number of cores. HTC Ozone features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 3200, because it has a lot higher resolution of 240 x 320 pixels.

The HTC Ozone captures way better pictures and videos than Nokia 3200, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 2 mega-pixels resolution. HTC Ozone counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as the Nokia 3200 one. The HTC Ozone counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 3200, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone costs exactly the same than Nokia 3200, making buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.