Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.643.5
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
2003-09-122012-02-27
4.21 x 1.77 x 0.83 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.17 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
0.10 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.085.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.6
Battery Life
780mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
288 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.243.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 has a score of 43.5, which is a lot better than the Nokia 3200's 26.6 general score. Nokia Asha 302's design is newer and noticeably thinner than Nokia 3200's, although it's heavier. Nokia Asha 302 has a much more powerful processing unit than Nokia 3200, because it has 1 more processing cores.

The Nokia Asha 302 has a much more vibrant display than Nokia 3200, because it has a much higher 240 x 320 resolution. Nokia Asha 302 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 3200, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a way better battery life than Nokia 3200, because it has 1430mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia Asha 302 captures much better videos and photos than Nokia 3200, because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back.

The Nokia Asha 302 and the Nokia 3200 cost the same, making buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.