Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.641.9
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
--Symbian 9.2
2003-09-122008-06-16
4.21 x 1.77 x 0.83 inches4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches
3.17 ounces4.47 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86.4
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.3
Storage
--112,64 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
01.36
Camera
0.10 MP3.20 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--640 x 480 (22 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.086.38
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.3
Battery Life
780mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
288 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
312 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.243.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red portInfra-red port

Comparison review

The Nokia E71x is a lot better than the Nokia 3200, having a general score of 41.9 against 26.6. The Nokia E71x construction is newer and thinner than the Nokia 3200's, although it's incredibly heavier. Nokia E71x features a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 3200, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).

The Nokia E71x has a lot better display than Nokia 3200, because it has a lot higher resolution of 240 x 320 pixels. Nokia E71x features a way better camera than Nokia 3200, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels. Nokia E71x features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 3200, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 8 GB.

Nokia E71x counts with a way better battery performance than Nokia 3200, because it has a 92 percent bigger battery capacity.

The Nokia E71x and the Nokia 3200 cost exactly the same, which makes it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.