Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.930.3
Basic Information
NokiaBLU
2004-05-310000-00-00
4.11 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches--
3.03 ounces4.23 ounces
--Black, Gray, Green, Orange, Pink and White
$ 519.00$ 199.00
Display / Screen
--3.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels --
TFTTFT
--64 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
34.5
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4,61 MB internal memory524,29 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.22.1
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
220 x 176 video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
3.635.39
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
760mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
280 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
390 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
2.162.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

The BLU TOUCH has a general score of 30.3, which is slightly better than Nokia 3220's general score of 27.9. BLU TOUCH's body is notably thinner but heavier than Nokia 3220. The BLU TOUCH counts with a processor that's very similar to the Nokia 3220 one, they have a 0-Core processor. BLU TOUCH counts with an incredibly better screen than Nokia 3220.

BLU TOUCH takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 3220, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels and a lot better 320x240 (QVGA) video resolution. The BLU TOUCH has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 3220, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 16 GB and 519,68 MB more internal storage capacity.

BLU TOUCH has longer battery life than Nokia 3220, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 760mAh.

Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, BLU TOUCH is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.