Compare phones
Samsung E1125
GT-E1125| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 30.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2004-05-31 | 2009-02-06 |
| 4.11 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches | 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.58 inches |
| 3.03 ounces | 2.34 ounces |
| $ 519.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.5 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | CSTN |
| -- | 121 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,61 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.24 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung E1125 is a little bit better than the Nokia 3220, with a 30.3 score against 27.9. Samsung E1125 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and lighter than Nokia 3220. The Samsung E1125 has an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 3220. Both have exactly the same 128 x 128 resolution.
Nokia 3220 and Samsung E1125 both feature really similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 3220 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung E1125. Samsung E1125 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Nokia 3220, because it has an 800mAh battery capacity against 760mAh.
The Nokia 3220 counts with a way better camera than Samsung E1125.
Samsung E1125 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.