Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.532.2
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 7.0Windows Mobile Standard 5.0
2004-11-022005-07-26
4.29 x 1.92 x 0.74 inches4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches
3.53 ounces4.06 ounces
$ 349.00$ 330.00
176 x 208 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
33
processor processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
6,14 MB internal memory--
RS-MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotminiSD external memory slot
1.520
Camera
1.20 MP1.30 MP
4.44.51
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
760mAh Li-Ion Battery1130mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
150 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
212 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.162.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 1.2
--GPS
Infra-red portInfra-red port

Comparison review

The Motorola Q CDMA has a global score of 32.2, which is a bit better than Nokia 3230's 29.5 overall score. The Motorola Q CDMA construction is way thinner but somewhat heavier than Nokia 3230, and both of them were released with only 9 months difference. Motorola Q CDMA comes with Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 operating system, while Nokia 3230 has Symbian 7.0 operating system.

The Nokia 3230 and the Motorola Q CDMA both count with quite similar screens, although the Motorola Q CDMA also has a way better 240 x 320 resolution. Nokia 3230 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Q CDMA. The Motorola Q CDMA's processor is very similar to the Nokia 3230 one, both have the same number of cores.

The Motorola Q CDMA counts with a superior battery duration than Nokia 3230, because it has a 49% greater battery size. The Motorola Q CDMA counts with a slightly better camera than Nokia 3230, because it has a back camera with a higher 1.3 megapixels resolution.

The Motorola Q CDMA not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.