Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.432
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
Symbian 9.1--
2005-09-262009-05-18
4.09 x 1.97 x 0.78 inches3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches
4.06 ounces3.19 ounces
--Black and Red
$ 269.00$ 195.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
176 x 208 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory9,22 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.20.2
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
245 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
432 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.722.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 2720 fold has a general score of 32, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 3250's score of 29.4. Nokia 2720 fold is a much newer device, and it is also thinner and much lighter than Nokia 3250. The Nokia 2720 fold features a lot better screen than Nokia 3250, although it has a lot worse 160 x 128px resolution.

Nokia 2720 fold's processing unit is very similar to the Nokia 3250 one, they have 0 cores. Nokia 2720 fold's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Nokia 3250's one, although the Nokia 2720 fold has no slot for an external memory card and just 9,22 MB internal memory. The Nokia 3250 has a slightly better camera than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a way better resolution back camera.

Nokia 3250 has improved battery duration than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a 1100mAh battery size instead of 860mAh.

Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia 2720 fold is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.