Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.5 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2003-03-11 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.48 x 2.48 x 0.78 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 349.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| MMC external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 230 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 has a score of 25.6, which is just a bit better than Nokia 3300's overall score of 23.5. The Motorola W270 design is a lot newer, notably thinner and notably lighter than Nokia 3300. The Motorola W270's processor is just as good as the Nokia 3300 one, both of them have 0 CPU cores.
Motorola W270 features a little bit better looking screen than Nokia 3300. Both of them have the same resolution of 128 x 128 pixels. Motorola W270 has a camera that's very similar to the camera in Nokia 3300. The Nokia 3300 and the Motorola W270 have really similar storage capacity for games and applications, although the Motorola W270 has no SD memory slot.
Motorola W270 has longer battery performance than Nokia 3300, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity against 720mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola W270 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.