Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.5 | 25.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2003-03-11 | 2007-05-03 |
| 4.48 x 2.48 x 0.78 inches | 3.42 x 1.77 x 0.82 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 2.83 ounces |
| $ 349.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| -- | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 230 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 310 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2660 has an overall score of 25.7, which is a bit better than Nokia 3300's overall score of 23.5. Although Nokia 2660 is just a little thicker than Nokia 3300, it's lighter and also way newer. The Nokia 3300 and the Nokia 2660 count with extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores.
Nokia 2660 features an incredibly better screen than Nokia 3300, because it has a slightly better 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 2660 features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 3300, although it has no slot for an external memory card. The Nokia 2660 has a camera that's just as good as the Nokia 3300 one.
The Nokia 2660's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Nokia 3300, although the Nokia 2660 has a 3 percent lower battery size.
The Nokia 2660 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.