Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.4 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 4.30 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Ni-MH Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 132 hours standby time 2.7 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson K200 has an overall score of 31.7, which is a lot better than Nokia 3390's general score of 22.4. The Sony Ericsson K200 is a incredibly thinner and lighter cellphone than Nokia 3390. Sony Ericsson K200's CPU is very similar to the Nokia 3390 one, they have the same number of cores.
Sony Ericsson K200 has a much more vibrant display than Nokia 3390. Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 3390. The Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a superior battery duration than Nokia 3390. The Sony Ericsson K200 captures much better photos and videos than Nokia 3390.
The Sony Ericsson K200 and the Nokia 3390 cost exactly the same, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.