Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.4 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 4.30 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Ni-MH Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson K200 is much better than Nokia 3395, with a overall score of 31.7 against 22.4. Sony Ericsson K200 is a notably lighter and much thinner phone than Nokia 3395. Sony Ericsson K200 features a way better looking screen than Nokia 3395. The Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 3395.
Nokia 3395 and Sony Ericsson K200 both count with extremely similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. The Sony Ericsson K200 features a greater camera than Nokia 3395. The Sony Ericsson K200 has a superior battery life than Nokia 3395.
The Sony Ericsson K200 costs the same than the Nokia 3395.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.