Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.1 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Panasonic |
| 2003-01-09 | 2005-02-14 |
| 4.65 x 1.97 x 0.91 inches | 3.78 x 1.81 x 0.98 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| -- | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1660mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 228 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 740 hours standby time 12 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 3.52 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Panasonic SA6 is a lot better than the Nokia 3560, with a overall score of 29.3 against 23.1. Even though the Panasonic SA6 is extremely newer than Nokia 3560, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. The Nokia 3560 and the Panasonic SA6 count with really similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores.
The Panasonic SA6 has a much better looking screen than Nokia 3560, because it has a lot better 240 x 320 resolution. Panasonic SA6 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Nokia 3560. Panasonic SA6 features a superior battery life than Nokia 3560, because it has 1660mAh of battery capacity.
Panasonic SA6 features a way better camera than Nokia 3560.
Panasonic SA6 costs the same than the Nokia 3560.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.