Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.1 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| 2003-01-09 | 2007-02-06 |
| 4.65 x 1.97 x 0.91 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 228 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.4 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson K200 is way better than Nokia 3560, getting a 31.7 score against 23.1. Sony Ericsson K200's construction is notably newer, way thinner and a lot lighter than Nokia 3560. Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a CPU that's just as good as Nokia 3560's CPU, both of them have 0 CPU cores. Sony Ericsson K200 has a much sharper display than Nokia 3560, because it has a way better 128 x 128px resolution.
The Sony Ericsson K200 has a lot better camera than Nokia 3560. The Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Nokia 3560. The Sony Ericsson K200 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Nokia 3560, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity against 850mAh.
Sony Ericsson K200 and the Nokia 3560 cost the same, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.