Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.743.5
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
--2012-02-27
4.68 x 1.96 x 0.92 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
4.10 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
96 x 65 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
55 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.26.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
850mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
216 hours standby time
3.8 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.323.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 302 has an overall score of 43.5, which is way better than the Nokia 3570's 24.7 global score. Nokia Asha 302 is a a bit lighter and extremely thinner phone than Nokia 3570. Nokia Asha 302 has a much better processing power than Nokia 3570, because it has a greater number of cores. The Nokia Asha 302 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 3570, because it has a much better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 240 x 320 pixels.

Nokia Asha 302 takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 3570. The Nokia Asha 302 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 3570, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 32 GB. The Nokia Asha 302 features a really longer battery performance than Nokia 3570, because it has 1430mAh of battery capacity against 850mAh.

Nokia Asha 302 and the Nokia 3570 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.