Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 23.4 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Kyocera |
| 2004-04-28 | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.68 x 1.96 x 0.92 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 4.10 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl has a global score of 24.5, which is a bit better than Nokia 3587i's 23.4 general score. The Kyocera Marbl is a way newer cellphone, and it is also extremely lighter and just a bit thinner than Nokia 3587i. Nokia 3587i and Kyocera Marbl both count with very similar processors, they have a 0-Core CPU.
The Kyocera Marbl has a much better looking screen than Nokia 3587i, because it has a much better 128 x 128 pixels resolution. Kyocera Marbl and Nokia 3587i feature very similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos. Nokia 3587i has just a little better battery life than Kyocera Marbl, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Nokia 3587i and Kyocera Marbl have really similar cameras.
Kyocera Marbl is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.