Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 23.4 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.60 x 1.92 x 0.94 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 4.10 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl is a little bit better than Nokia 3589i, with a global score of 24.5 against 23.4. Kyocera Marbl is a somewhat thinner and extremely lighter phone than the Nokia 3589i. The Kyocera Marbl has an incredibly better screen than Nokia 3589i, because it has a way higher 128 x 128 resolution.
Kyocera Marbl counts with as much memory to store more games and applications as the Nokia 3589i one. Kyocera Marbl's CPU is just as good as the Nokia 3589i one, they have 0 processing cores. The Nokia 3589i counts with just a little better battery duration than Kyocera Marbl, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Nokia 3589i and Kyocera Marbl both count with quite similar cameras.
The Kyocera Marbl not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.