Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.4 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.60 x 1.92 x 0.94 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 4.10 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has an overall score of 25.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia 3589i's 23.4 score. The Motorola W270 construction is way thinner and lighter than Nokia 3589i. The Motorola W270 features a CPU that is very similar to the Nokia 3589i one, both have 0 CPU cores. Motorola W270 has a little bit better screen than Nokia 3589i, because it has a way higher resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
The Motorola W270's camera is very similar to the camera in Nokia 3589i. The Motorola W270 features as much storage to store more games and applications as the Nokia 3589i one. The Nokia 3589i has a little better battery duration than Motorola W270, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola W270 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.