Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.2 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Panasonic |
| 2002-03-18 | 2005-02-14 |
| 4.68 x 1.97 x 0.90 inches | 3.78 x 1.81 x 0.98 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 825mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1660mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 740 hours standby time 12 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 3.52 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Panasonic SA6 has an overall score of 29.3, which is way better than the Nokia 3590's score of 23.2. Panasonic SA6's construction is a lot newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Nokia 3590. Panasonic SA6's processing unit is very similar to the Nokia 3590 one, both have a 0-Core CPU.
The Panasonic SA6 features a lot better looking display than Nokia 3590, because it has a lot higher 240 x 320 resolution. Panasonic SA6 captures greater pictures and videos than Nokia 3590. Panasonic SA6 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 3590. The Panasonic SA6 has a much better battery performance than Nokia 3590, because it has a 1660mAh battery capacity.
Panasonic SA6 and the Nokia 3590 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.