Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 23.3 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.76 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 95.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl has a global score of 24.5, which is slightly better than Nokia 3595's 23.3 global score. The Kyocera Marbl is a a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Nokia 3595. The Kyocera Marbl features an incredibly better display than Nokia 3595, because it has a lot higher 128 x 128 resolution.
Kyocera Marbl's CPU is very similar to the processor in Nokia 3595, both have the same number of cores. Kyocera Marbl's camera is very similar to the Nokia 3595 one. Nokia 3595 and Kyocera Marbl both feature very similar storage capacity for games and applications. Nokia 3595 features a little better battery performance than Kyocera Marbl, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Kyocera Marbl not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.