Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.3 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.76 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 95.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Motorola W315 is slightly better than the Nokia 3595, having a overall score of 24.7 against 23.3. Motorola W315 is a lighter and just a little thinner device than Nokia 3595. Motorola W315 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in Nokia 3595, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.
Motorola W315 has a bit sharper display than Nokia 3595, because it has a way better resolution of 160 x 128. The Motorola W315 features a camera that is very similar to Nokia 3595's camera. The Motorola W315 features as much memory for applications and games as the Nokia 3595. Nokia 3595 counts with longer battery life than Motorola W315, because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Motorola W315 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.