Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.537.6
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2008-04-282010-05-10
3.85 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches4.12 x 2.08 x 0.58 inches
3.43 ounces3.85 ounces
$ 179.00$ 160.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenYes
6.65.6
processor processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.41.32
Camera
3.20 MP1.30 MP
640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution--
5.174.51
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
280 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
5.8 hours talk time
2.322.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1

Comparison review

Samsung Seek is slightly better than Nokia 3600 slide, having a 37.6 score against 34.5. The Samsung Seek body is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Nokia 3600 slide. Nokia 3600 slide counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Seek, because although it has a much smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, the Nokia 3600 slide also counts with more pixels per display inch.

Samsung Seek has a CPU that's very similar to the Nokia 3600 slide one, both of them have a 0-Core processor. The Samsung Seek has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 3600 slide. The Samsung Seek features superior battery life than Nokia 3600 slide, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia 3600 slide takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Seek, because it has a way better resolution camera.

Samsung Seek is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.