Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.137.5
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.0
2009-07-092007-06-05
4.53 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches3.93 x 2.28 x 0.54 inches
3.32 ounces3.95 ounces
Gray and Yellow--
$ 350.00$ 210.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.45.7
Performance
--TI OMAP850 chipset
processor Single-Core 201 MHz processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.30
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
4.844.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.32.7
Battery Life
1050mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
450 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.642.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

HTC Touch has a general score of 37.5, which is slightly better than Nokia 3720 classic's 34.1 global score. Although the HTC Touch is notably older and somewhat heavier than Nokia 3720 classic, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Nokia 3720 classic features a more vivid display than HTC Touch, because although it has a much smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240, the Nokia 3720 classic also counts with a better screen density.

The HTC Touch's processor is very similar to Nokia 3720 classic's processing unit, although the HTC Touch also has more cores. Nokia 3720 classic counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than HTC Touch, although it has no external SD slot. Nokia 3720 classic counts with a bit better camera than HTC Touch. Both of them have the same resolution camera in the back.

HTC Touch has just a little bit longer battery duration than Nokia 3720 classic, because it has a 5% larger battery size.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC Touch is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.