Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan and Sand | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a lot better than the Nokia 5.3's overall score of 69.3. The Galaxy A50 body is lighter and just a little thinner than the Nokia 5.3, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Nokia 5.3. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 features a much better looking display than Nokia 5.3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a better pixel count in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 5.3, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A50 takes much clearer videos and photos than Nokia 5.3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations. The Galaxy A50's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Nokia 5.3.
The Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Nokia 5.3, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.