Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.2 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-04 | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.67 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 225 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 is a bit better than the Nokia 5100, getting a score of 24.7 against 23.2. Motorola W315 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Nokia 5100. The Motorola W315 has a little sharper display than Nokia 5100, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 160 x 128px.
Motorola W315 and Nokia 5100 feature very similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores. Motorola W315 has a camera that's very similar to Nokia 5100's camera. The Motorola W315's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Nokia 5100 one. The Motorola W315 features greater battery duration than Nokia 5100, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola W315 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.