Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.260.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--Android 4.2
2002-11-042014-03-15
4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
3.67 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
128 x 128 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
LCDTFT
--245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.87.8
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
04.62
Camera
--5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
05.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
GPRS and GSMHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMMicro SIM
0.24.6
Battery Life
720mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
225 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
--
2.084
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is a lot better than the Nokia 5100's 23.2 general score. Although the Galaxy S3 Slim is incredibly heavier than the Nokia 5100, it's notably thinner and also noticeably newer. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a much better display than Nokia 5100, because it has a much better 960 x 540 resolution.

Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a much better performance than Nokia 5100, because it has a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy S3 Slim shoots much clearer photos and videos than Nokia 5100. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 5100, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a very superior battery performance than Nokia 5100, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.

The Galaxy S3 Slim and the Nokia 5100 cost the same, which makes this phone an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.