Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 37.8 | 41.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.3 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2009-05-06 |
| 4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches | 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 3.46 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 290.00 | $ 190.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 6.4 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 6.75 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 61,44 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 1.5 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 1.1 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 792 hours standby time 10.4 hours talk time | 672 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia E52 has a score of 41.4, which is just a bit better than Nokia 515's 37.8 score. Nokia E52's design is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Nokia 515. The Nokia E52 features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 515. Both of them have a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a same size display and the same exact 320 x 240 resolution.
Nokia E52 counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 515, although it has an external memory slot that admits 16 GB smaller. The Nokia E52 features a superior performance than Nokia 515, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Nokia 515 features a way better camera than Nokia E52, and although they both have the same 320x240 video resolution, the Nokia 515 also has better 30 fps video frame rate and a camera with a way better 5 mega pixels resolution. The Nokia E52 counts with superior battery lifetime than Nokia 515, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1200mAh.
Nokia E52 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.