Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 3.63 x 1.90 x 0.81 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.67 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| STN | P-OLED |
| 93 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 5,12 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 263 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is way better than the Nokia 5200, having a score of 82.5 against 29.9. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a heavier but way thinner phone than Nokia 5200. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much greater performance than Nokia 5200, because it has a higher number of cores. Google Pixel 2 XL features a lot better screen than Nokia 5200, because it has a way better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Google Pixel 2 XL takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 5200, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much higher (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 5200, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much longer battery performance than Nokia 5200, because it has a 403 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.